Re: GitHub reliability

René Ferdinand Rivera Morell via Boost <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
Message-ID <CAHEh_GgKggU-U2tKR9iTRc-5S4+8dsaBnZ2hOt9bD8DdoaM-FQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, May 10, 2026 at 6:29 PM Vinnie Falco via Boost <
[email protected]> wrote:

> GitHub has become increasingly unreliable. I suggest the Boost project
> explore alternatives to be ready in case the need to move to a new hosted
> provider arises. We (the C++ Alliance) are investigating Codeberg.
>

I think any suggestion to move needs to be considered from a technical
perspective. What aspects of GitHub have been problematic? What features of
GH do we depend on?

I personally haven't noticed much problems with GH except for one.. The
semi-random changes in what is supported in the Windows images. But that's
minor and understandable, from a maintenance POV.


-- 
-- René Ferdinand Rivera Morell
-- Don't Assume Anything  -- No Supongas Nada
-- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net
_______________________________________________
Boost mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/
Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/5YOYVBZFVOS6RSX4UU5H4N66VJPTIVKG/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.