Re: GitHub reliability
Vinnie Falco via Boost <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+EzHGcL=5g4A_nB22MDBgycMKVLqo=9fwdvMynEbciE9JPrwg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 12:09 PM Andrey Semashev via Boost < [email protected]> wrote: > For example, drone.cpp.al is not accessible It should work. It’s our domain. Maybe you cannot access the Albania TLD? Sam can fix this easily… drone.cppalliance.org should also work. I think we are all getting ahead of ourselves here. I am not suggesting we move. What I am saying is specific: We should evaluate each of the alternatives to GitHub. What would a migration look like? What would we gain? What would we lose? The objective is simply to be prepared *if* and only if the need arises. This way we are not caught off-guard at the last minute if GitHub takes a sudden turn and its quality of service impairs the Boost mission to deliver our libraries reliably three times a year. To start, let’s catalog the possible solutions. Codeberg Gitlab Gitea (is this a hosted solution?) Then for each solution we can research what they offer and have a write up. I can create a repository for this so we can all contribute to shared documents. Thanks _______________________________________________ Boost mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/ Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/4RCNZRZGZ6GMHP5ZOF5QVQWDR4JNMLX7/