Re: GitHub reliability

Vinnie Falco via Boost <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
Message-ID <CA+EzHGcL=5g4A_nB22MDBgycMKVLqo=9fwdvMynEbciE9JPrwg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 12:09 PM Andrey Semashev via Boost <
[email protected]> wrote:

> For example, drone.cpp.al is not accessible


It should work. It’s our domain. Maybe you cannot access the Albania TLD?
Sam can fix this easily… drone.cppalliance.org should also work.

I think we are all getting ahead of ourselves here. I am not suggesting we
move. What I am saying is specific:

We should evaluate each of the alternatives to GitHub. What would a
migration look like? What would we gain? What would we lose? The objective
is simply to be prepared *if* and only if the need arises. This way we are
not caught off-guard at the last minute if GitHub takes a sudden turn and
its quality of service impairs the Boost mission to deliver our libraries
reliably three times a year.

To start, let’s catalog the possible solutions.

Codeberg

Gitlab

Gitea (is this a hosted solution?)

Then for each solution we can research what they offer and have a write up.
I can create a repository for this so we can all contribute to shared
documents.

Thanks
_______________________________________________
Boost mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/
Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/4RCNZRZGZ6GMHP5ZOF5QVQWDR4JNMLX7/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.