Re: GitHub reliability
Klemens Morgenstern via Boost <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGT5OKNpZhBwZKCus0AfFQtBsbY2T7nQfrDc=886XY1RtUCEnA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 12:11 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost < [email protected]> wrote: > On 11 May 2026 02:28, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote: > > GitHub has become increasingly unreliable. I suggest the Boost project > > explore alternatives to be ready in case the need to move to a new hosted > > provider arises. We (the C++ Alliance) are investigating Codeberg. > > While I agree that GitHub availability and reliability has been going > down in recent years, I can't tell whether the alternatives would be an > improvement, in general or for me personally. I have no experience with > Codeberg, and I don't know how reliable it is. > I assumed an alternative would be self-hosted. I don't think jumping to another provider is a long-term solution. github could be the official mirror, which also means that many people will clone from there, so we could offload some traffic. _______________________________________________ Boost mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/ Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/RE3B6MUG3LGH6YZ6MVE24JBLRZWSXOD6/