Re: Boost Review for Capy and Corosio - June 23 to July 7th

Vinnie Falco via Boost <[email protected]> Mon, 22 Jun 2026 09:07:56 -0700

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
Message-ID	<CA+EzHGd=aipuNSc1dqy9hnEE4iz3NRRY5O7H6U3vwOYYERKnPQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jun 20, 2026 at 6:38 AM Glen Fernandes via Boost <
[email protected]> wrote:

> If the underlying library is rejected but the high level one isn't, then
> the recommendation is for the former to just be an implementation detail
> of the  latter.
>

The two libraries really should be considered as a single work that have a
structural separation. I write about the motivation for this separation
here:

*Why Capy Is Separate*
https://develop.capy.cpp.al/capy/9.design/9b.Separation.html

Thanks
_______________________________________________
Boost mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/
Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/4H3OHPD3CYOHIVGQOGFIXS4IFPIZMEWU/