Re: [Capy review] Some questions

On Tuesday, June 23rd, 2026 at 8:08 PM, Ruben Perez via Boost <[email protected]> wrote:

> > > > > 4) Does capy::cond::canceled add anything vs. just using
> > > > > std::errc::operation_canceled?
> > > >
> > > > No, it doesn't. It is there for consistency with our error types that
> > don't have std spellings.
> > >
> > > Would it make sense to just use the errc one and remove capy's? Maybe
> > > Peter can suggest something here?
> >
> > We have a convention throughout the project to always compare against
> > error conditions. Making a change like that would make it the oddball.
> 
> 
> Why? std::errc is an error condition enum, not an error code enum.

To clarify, I mean our error conditions as indicated here:
https://develop.capy.cpp.al/capy/reference/boost/capy/cond.html

"These are the conditions callers should compare against when handling errors from capy operations."
_______________________________________________
Boost mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/
Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/6HTBH5RSFN5XLI53DFWGCJQ2PK34MSE2/