Re: Capy Review
Vinnie Falco via Boost <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Jun 2026 15:57:40 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+EzHGdsAfD2afDzwzzbJXErjZssJ+O-SPEGNNG1uevR4rcPsw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 12:09 PM Christian Mazakas via Boost < [email protected]> wrote: > First off, congrats. > Thanks > So basically, we _are_ reviewing _two_ separate Boost libraries here. In principle, > I think this is fine but it's just confusing to muddy those waters. > Rainer's review stands then, and isn't a scope error. He has no onus to > look at Corosio. > I have to go where the evidence leads and you are right on this. Yet "Capy is useless" and "Capy should not be public" are both provably false statements. We have not done a good job documenting Capy's value proposition, this is a real problem. It is also a difficult problem. Regards _______________________________________________ Boost mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/ Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/UE2CKOMD6QYHSIQHQVJGHZTWLYFTC4I4/