Re: Capy Review

Vinnie Falco via Boost <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Jun 2026 22:54:25 -0700

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
Message-ID	<CA+EzHGfMZnogHevFCY6C8P3uWtiY8v0CqCRd1thycNx6=32j1A@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 7:51 PM Peter Dimov via Boost <[email protected]>
wrote:

> This has to be a misunderstanding. Establishing this protocol and testing it
> in practice was definitely a goal for Capy, and the most important one (for
>  me at least.)
>

Yes well I already conceded that the library was not documented correctly.
So then I will ask what is the correct way to present Capy? And how should
it be evaluated?

Thanks
_______________________________________________
Boost mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/
Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/37ATHOJLDC6DCN2ZMU5BT6FAIMN33GL4/