Re: [Capy/Corosio review] Benchmark results

On Mon, 29 Jun 2026 at 00:02, Marcelo Zimbres Silva via Boost
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi, some months ago I started implementing new benchmarks for
> Boost.Redis to compare it to the current state of other popular
> clients.  While underway with it Boost.Redis gained Corosio support,
> something that has been announced by Ruben Perez in this mailing list
> recently.

Have you considered replicating your experiments on the cost of async
abstractions [1], but for Capy/Corosio? I'd be really interested in
the cost that tasks that complete immediately have. Note that I'm
talking about tasks, rather than awaitables - so something like:

capy::io_task<> queue_push(int value) {
   if (!full()) {
      container.push_back(value);
      co_return {};
   }
   // wait for space
}

The reason why I'm asking this is because this is the kind of code
that the "Application developers" user tier [2] has the ability to
write, and hence the most abundant.

Thanks,
Ruben.

[1] https://github.com/boostorg/redis/blob/develop/doc/on-the-costs-of-async-abstractions.md
[2] https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P4172R1.pdf
_______________________________________________
Boost mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/
Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/BIZO2UVZFECE4RXMWTFY3AGFDGOL7KQF/