Re: Capy review
Steve Gerbino via Boost <[email protected]> Mon, 29 Jun 2026 18:12:59 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <o1VCvFQkIlTmkMcj5dAqST_YbZsoZJetQyZc531mymo1-sHWfX_AEOXZ6zI-GA9pISyGbdhAYVkLYdyKR-HHzhiWG4e0kvVyVUleTIdMgk0=@gerbino.co> |
On Monday, June 29th, 2026 at 7:32 PM, Ruben Perez via Boost <[email protected]> wrote: > My recommendation is to CONDITIONALLY ACCEPT Capy and Corosio into > Boost, provided that: > > * Asio integration is properly implemented. > * The delay/timeout/timer interface is redesigned. > * The TLS implementation gaps are filled. > > Kind regards, > Ruben. Thank you for the very thoughtful review. You bring up several very good points that we will certainly address. _______________________________________________ Boost mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/ Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/MJLR4AC52IYVIB2O7KEWFX4MMOMBKITB/