Re: [Capy/Corosio review] Benchmark results

On Tue, 30 Jun 2026 at 18:29, Christian Mazakas via Boost
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Personally, I think it's a little unwise to attempt to publish numbers without actually understanding the benchmarks in question.

I implemented the benchmark for each client myself so I guess I understand them.

> It's poor form to say profiling is out of scope but still publish numbers anyway.

Perhaps you skipped the raw data from my previous email? You have been
provided with multiple profiling information.

  - pidstat -u: Report CPU utilization.
  - pidstat -v: Threads, file descriptors.
  - pidstat -w: Context switches.
  - pidstat -r: Page faults and memory utilization.
  - perf stat -B: Cache and branch misses.

The flamegraphs for clients other than Boost.Redis is obviously
useless information to me as I am not familiar with their source code.
Perhaps you should do that yourself and PR them with a fix?
_______________________________________________
Boost mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/
Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/A6HHPDF5K77PNIMPTWDMJD2XISWMBCAF/