Re: Capy and Corosio review
Steve Gerbino via Boost <[email protected]> Mon, 06 Jul 2026 14:23:38 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <tyMsz6D2RQTP9JaWP7qv-2iKaLnxvdBt6qdDMpaaIjis-E5Uudlgti3frWBPGBWDJbTUpPJRlvgCesH-oO7PDvNFVdFZ3yDr7LgvgGOjo-c=@gerbino.co> |
On Friday, July 3rd, 2026 at 8:44 PM, Marcelo Zimbres Silva via Boost <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, but it is important to notice that Corosio competes with Asio and > increases the ecosystem fragmentation. This is not a Capy/Corosio > fault and there is precedent for competing libraries in Boost, but it > really hurts the overall C++ software quality, for example, when your > http client uses one net lib, the database driver another and so on. > Perhaps soon there will be a senders and receiver based net lib. > Libraries aren't likely to support all net variations natively and > interop will be more likely. > > > 9. Are there API, naming, usability, extensibility, or implementation concerns that should be addressed? > > I vote ACCEPT. > > Thanks, > Marcelo Thank you for taking the time to review Capy/Corosio and for providing some insight in to the performance against similar libraries. _______________________________________________ Boost mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/ Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/RD7OO27V6VFFV2RFIZSEIVRDVT5OG4YX/