Re: Getting a draft watermark
"Paul A. Bristow" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Daniel James > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 5:00 PM > To: Discussion of Boost Documentation > Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] Getting a draft watermark > > On 16 June 2011 16:11, Paul A. Bristow <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I've asked for help on the Doxygen bugzilla site. > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652741 > > > > > > Bug 652741 > > I wouldn't open a bug for that. It makes sense to set the background to white, as people set their browser > backgrounds to custom colours - if you set the text colour you also need to set the background colour (and > vice versa) to make sure the text is visible. OK I can see that would be useful. > Since you're editing the css, you can probably just put your rule after theirs, or change theirs to use > 'background-color: white', which won't override 'background-image'. 'background-color: white' sounds more sensible. Reading http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/colors.html, I'm still puzzled my specifying background-image doesn't override the 'background : white" command. But I'm getting tired and I've got my draft watermark... Thanks Paul