Re: HTML version of documentation - Store using SVN or leave users to build
"Paul A. Bristow" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Daniel James > Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:46 AM > To: Discussion of Boost Documentation > Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] HTML version of documentation - Store using SVN or leave users to build > > On 7 September 2011 10:02, Paul A. Bristow > > > > > But that doesn't answer the need for people to be able to read the > > html without generating it themselves (requiring Quickbook, Doxygen > > Autoindex, bjam ...) > > Can't you just upload them to a web server and include them in the zipfile? I think sourceforge, github and > bitbucket all have free static hosting for open source projects. You could ask to be added to the boost- > sandbox sourceforge project, although github and bitbucket look easier to setup. For sourceforge you > need to set up ssh keys and rsync, which is a bit of a pain. Well I noted that many people seemed to be doing something like that, but it seemed a most untidy solution, when the main project files are in Boost-sandbox. And a hassle, for the author and readers? > By the way, when building doxygen/boostbook based documentation, you should delete the previously > generated html files as the names aren't consistent so you end up with duplicates. Indeed a hazard, as I have already discovered. Would a zip of the html docs be better? Just trying to find the 'right' thing to do. Paul --- Paul A. Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal LA8 8AB UK +44 1539 561830 07714330204 [email protected]