Re: Sphinx integration

Mateusz Loskot <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.boost.documentation
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 05/10/11 17:25, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> on Wed Oct 05 2011, "Paul A. Bristow" <pbristow-AT-hetp.u-net.com> wrote:
>>
>> We won't get a unanimous view I'm sure, but it should be a better
>> guide than the developers preferences.
> 
> I'm not so sure.  The universe of design options is so vast that I think
> users need to be presented with alternatives.  I find
> http://cpp-next.com far easier to read than most of the Boost pages, for
> example.

Hallelujah!

That is what motivated me to start discussing Sphinx.

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Member of ACCU, http://accu.org
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.