Re: Sphinx integration

On 11/10/11 15:55, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> on Tue Oct 11 2011, Mateusz Loskot<mateusz-AT-loskot.net>  wrote:
>> On 11/10/11 14:40, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>>> on Tue Oct 11 2011, Mateusz Loskot<mateusz-AT-loskot.net>   wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Sorry, I don't know what you mean by "implement the unification for use
>>>>> and processing of Doxygen in Boost."  Could you explain?
>>>>
>>>> I mean that, presumably, it is a good idea if all Boost libraries
>>>> documented using Doxygen use exactly the same tool to transform the
>>>> Doxygen comments into API reference in BoostBook or QuickBook format.
>>>>
>>>> This way, look&   feel of all API references would be consistent
>>>> and authors would probably be encouraged to update comments for better
>>>> Boost API documentation coverage.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> In fact, it shouldn't be up to the individual libraries; the
>>> transformation should be part of the documentation build process.
>>
>> Yes, that's what I have in mind.
>>
>> Now, regarding the implementation of such translator:
>> - is there anything already available in current doc tools in Boost,
>> Vault,...?
>> - if not, where it should go? separate cmd line tool like quickbook?
>> - what's best way to parse XML for BoostDoc for ? libxml, Boost.Tree,
>> Spirit?
>
> I don't think I know the answers oto these questions.  There's
> *something* in Boost.Build for this, but that's as much as I remember.

OK. I'll try to discover it myself.
Thank you, Paul and others for brainstorming the whole thing.

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Member of ACCU, http://accu.org