Re: Sphinx integration
Mateusz Łoskot <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABUeae-0iK5bT+0c3uSHOfU6-hH1CpMa_R0gc2u6zmzsc4SHxQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On 13 October 2011 03:16, Rene Rivera <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/11/2011 8:57 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> Now, regarding the implementation of such translator: >> - is there anything already available in current doc tools in Boost, >> Vault,...? >> - if not, where it should go? separate cmd line tool like quickbook? >> - what's best way to parse XML for BoostDoc for ? libxml, Boost.Tree, >> Spirit? > > <http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/tools/build/v2/tools/doxproc.py> > > And there's support for using that already in the b2 "doxygen.jam" file > <http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/tools/build/v2/tools/doxygen.jam>: > > # Which processor to use for various translations from Doxygen. > feature.feature doxygen.processor : xsltproc doxproc : propagated implicit ; Thanks, I will take a look. > And of course the currently used xsltproc translator. Is this what you are > wanting? Or did I not understand the thread? The latter is also possible. The more I'm thinking about the initial issue, the more I'm convinced about its utopian nature. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org Member of ACCU, http://accu.org