Re: Sphinx integration

Mateusz Łoskot <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.boost.documentation
Message-ID <CABUeae-0iK5bT+0c3uSHOfU6-hH1CpMa_R0gc2u6zmzsc4SHxQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 13 October 2011 03:16, Rene Rivera <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10/11/2011 8:57 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> Now, regarding the implementation of such translator:
>> - is there anything already available in current doc tools in Boost,
>> Vault,...?
>> - if not, where it should go? separate cmd line tool like quickbook?
>> - what's best way to parse XML for BoostDoc for ? libxml, Boost.Tree,
>> Spirit?
>
> <http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/tools/build/v2/tools/doxproc.py>
>
> And there's support for using that already in the b2 "doxygen.jam" file
> <http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/tools/build/v2/tools/doxygen.jam>:
>
> # Which processor to use for various translations from Doxygen.
> feature.feature doxygen.processor : xsltproc doxproc : propagated implicit ;

Thanks, I will take a look.

> And of course the currently used xsltproc translator. Is this what you are
> wanting? Or did I not understand the thread?

The latter is also possible. The more I'm thinking about the initial
issue, the more I'm convinced about its utopian nature.

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Member of ACCU, http://accu.org
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.