Re: Sphinx integration
Dave Abrahams <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
on Thu Oct 13 2011, Mateusz Łoskot <mateusz-AT-loskot.net> wrote: > On 13 October 2011 03:16, Rene Rivera <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 10/11/2011 8:57 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > >>> Now, regarding the implementation of such translator: >>> - is there anything already available in current doc tools in Boost, >>> Vault,...? >>> - if not, where it should go? separate cmd line tool like quickbook? >>> - what's best way to parse XML for BoostDoc for ? libxml, Boost.Tree, >>> Spirit? >> >> <http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/tools/build/v2/tools/doxproc.py> >> >> And there's support for using that already in the b2 "doxygen.jam" file >> <http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/tools/build/v2/tools/doxygen.jam>: >> >> # Which processor to use for various translations from Doxygen. >> feature.feature doxygen.processor : xsltproc doxproc : propagated implicit ; > > Thanks, I will take a look. > >> And of course the currently used xsltproc translator. Is this what you are >> wanting? Or did I not understand the thread? > > The latter is also possible. The more I'm thinking about the initial > issue, the more I'm convinced about its utopian nature. Hi Mateusz, I've been intending to ask what you mean by this. I do hope you're not giving up. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-docs