Re: [quickbook] Does import work?
Rene Rivera <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.documentation |
|---|---|
| Organization | Redshift Software, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/16/2011 9:21 AM, Steven Watanabe wrote: > AMDG > > On 10/16/2011 06:16 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote: >> >> on Sun Oct 16 2011, Daniel James<dnljms-AT-gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Saturday, 15 October 2011, Rene Rivera wrote: >>> >>> >>> Are you saying this only works while inside a code-snippet? We >>> can't do straight out inclusion of quickbook. >>> >>> >>> I assume you mean inclusion of source files. >> >> I think you may be misunderstanding. IIUC, Rene wants to compose >> quickbook "code" by inclusion much as we do with #include in the C/C++ >> preprocessor. >> > > I don't think so. We can already do that > with [include xxx.qbk]. His example uses > a C++ header, not quickbook. Right. I'm trying to have "[import ..]" work as easy as Doxygen does, but for quickbook. As documenting the library I'm working on would otherwise be a serious PITA. And I'd rather avoid using Doxygen for it as it's much easier to deal with quickbook directly. Ultimately I want to be able to: === [import boost/predef/*.h] [import boost/predef/*/*.h] [import boost/predef/*/*/*.h] === And have all the documentation that's embedded in those source files injected into the quickbook stream. Without me having to maintain what the files are, or what they contain. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail