Re: [quickbook] Does import work?

Rene Rivera <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.boost.documentation
Organization Redshift Software, Inc.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 10/16/2011 9:21 AM, Steven Watanabe wrote:
> AMDG
>
> On 10/16/2011 06:16 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>>
>> on Sun Oct 16 2011, Daniel James<dnljms-AT-gmail.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> On Saturday, 15 October 2011, Rene Rivera wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>      Are you saying this only works while inside a code-snippet? We
>>>      can't do straight out inclusion of quickbook.
>>>
>>>
>>> I assume you mean inclusion of source files.
>>
>> I think you may be misunderstanding.  IIUC, Rene wants to compose
>> quickbook "code" by inclusion much as we do with #include in the C/C++
>> preprocessor.
>>
>
> I don't think so.  We can already do that
> with [include xxx.qbk].  His example uses
> a C++ header, not quickbook.

Right. I'm trying to have "[import ..]" work as easy as Doxygen does, 
but for quickbook. As documenting the library I'm working on would 
otherwise be a serious PITA. And I'd rather avoid using Doxygen for it 
as it's much easier to deal with quickbook directly. Ultimately I want 
to be able to:

===
[import boost/predef/*.h]
[import boost/predef/*/*.h]
[import boost/predef/*/*/*.h]
===

And have all the documentation that's embedded in those source files 
injected into the quickbook stream. Without me having to maintain what 
the files are, or what they contain.


-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.