Re: [quickbook] Does import work?
Joel de Guzman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/17/2011 4:46 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote: > > on Sun Oct 16 2011, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot-AT-gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 10/16/2011 11:38 AM, Daniel James wrote: >>> On Sunday, 16 October 2011, Rene Rivera wrote: >> >>>> >>>> >>>> Right. I'm trying to have "[import ..]" work as easy as Doxygen does, but >>>> for quickbook. As documenting the library I'm working on would otherwise be >>>> a serious PITA. And I'd rather avoid using Doxygen for it as it's much >>>> easier to deal with quickbook directly. Ultimately I want to be able to: >>>> >>>> === >>>> [import boost/predef/*.h] >>>> [import boost/predef/*/*.h] >>>> [import boost/predef/*/*/*.h] >>>> === >>>> >>>> And have all the documentation that's embedded in those source files >>>> injected into the quickbook stream. Without me having to maintain what the >>>> files are, or what they contain. >>>> >>> >>> So you don't want to include the whole headers, just the documentation >>> embedded in them? >> >> Right. >> >>> This feels like a bit of an odd thing to do in quickbook >>> itself, >> >> Is it any odder than the existing import facility? > > Seems like a natural bit of Literate Programming functionality to me. Looks good to me. I like the idea. I also have a big dislike for Doxygen. (Been in lurk mode recently) Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://boost-spirit.com