Re: The beauty of LATEX
Steven Watanabe <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.documentation |
|---|---|
| Organization | Providere Consulting, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
AMDG On 10/17/2011 06:00 PM, Joel de Guzman wrote: > On 10/18/2011 8:24 AM, Daniel James wrote: >> On 18 October 2011 00:37, Joel de Guzman <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Non- >>> Dox users, like me and Rene, should not be forced to have >>> Dox features down our throat. >> >> When have I done that? > > You haven't done anything like that. Please don't take that > as an accusation. > > What I meant is that quickbook should be free of Doxygen-isms. Technically funcref, classref, etc. are BoostBook-isms. Doxygen is just a convenient way to generate the BoostBook reference. > Anything tool-specific should not really be intrinsic to the > language. quickbook can and should be target agnostic. It is > very possible to achieve target-specific features through > external Qbk template libraries. > In Christ, Steven Watanabe _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-docs
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 490 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOnNo5AAoJEDTBQuhymLHSGdIIAJqBSwrBel9fQ4wiInCyvmc0 6zMfgmJ/oW4+ZHcvX4hyj66jLyD0a2NwodbRjQDeEejRm66+CoE14S0RJ5yklGmW +EVTi1htCrAFA1oFrUx43gRba/g7RXZHU8y6esbdTy3N7b2iz0J3249oUVaU7IrI P30s4c9jTYt55/RH1SfdNP9iHEoE4O6yZK+LuFciFUUUIHrS5pdEOwSOOxE5ryVP raEGMuf0hOmSY8SIhllJ9wLn3qImLugApFV/PK68QKCURDKU8ukX49vsY24ZiZVP +3WQnBfA+DTExX2GxQYBBC4bsNfaVVXqtyRV9KwcIBWoeNabgsAi20YsYytgGPU= =hZv7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----