Re: The beauty of LATEX
Dave Abrahams <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
on Mon Oct 17 2011, Daniel James <dnljms-AT-gmail.com> wrote: > On 17 October 2011 06:35, Joel de Guzman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> To be honest, I've been quite disappointed with DocBook and its >> ugly hack (tool chain) at generating PDF files. > > O'Reilly use docbook for all of their books, although they might use > commercial software for generating the final book. I'm not sure. But > it is possible to get decent results from docbook. Sure. Since docbook is a semantically rich format, you can translate it into LaTeX, or whatever. The problem is the usual backends. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com