Re: The beauty of LATEX
Joel de Guzman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/20/2011 1:54 AM, Paul A. Bristow wrote: >> Joel de Guzman >> But really, it's not just aesthetics. What I hate most is the insane and fragile toolchain that's > sooo >> impenetrable to hacking. I'd insist that the way to move forward is to get rid of this nasty > toolchain, or at >> least provide an alternative, more reasonable, more hackable, toolchain. LaTeX is vastly more > refined and >> mature. > > I'll happily go with that - I've suffered grievously with the toolchain (but mostly unnecessarily > through lack of good documentation of the toolchain and its foibles. Now I've got going, I am > knocking stuff out quite quickly). > > But I'm still adamant that a good toolchain should allow us to build a source-linked C++ reference > automatically, pulling in what has been 'handwritten' about classes, functions, macros, typdefs - > the info that might be described as 'concepts' - parameters, returns, throws... Can't disagree there. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://boost-spirit.com