Re: The beauty of LATEX
Mateusz Łoskot <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABUeae-rPrHq6WxyfG_8cgOSFTOuXZwemHnP9khrJew5RkFxXw@mail.gmail.com> |
2011/10/21 Mateusz Łoskot <[email protected]>: > On 21 October 2011 12:02, Paul A. Bristow <[email protected]> wrote: >> If we have a C++ function in a header, and provide some 'concept' info in Doxygen syntax inside a >> C++ comment. >> >> /*! >> nontype template function that just returns the template value. >> \tparam size is a constant integer argument. >> \returns constant integer size always. >> \pre No preconditions. >> \post No side effects. >> \throws Never. >> \warning This is not a very useful function. >> \see More useful functions. >> */ >> template <int size> >> int template_parameter_size() >> { >> return size; >> } >> >> Could we invent a better syntax? I'm sceptical - it seems so simple. > > Doxygen is greedy (in regexp terms). > To make Doxygen greedy, you need to juggle comment styles what leads to mess. ---------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^ I made mistake, it should read "not greedy", of course. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org Member of ACCU, http://accu.org _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-docs