Re: Quickbook block element
Daniel James <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHOE3ycM64CHkFRqbpwaWQXhMT7QWQBnGzccKG+ZGCsyFNPghg@mail.gmail.com> |
On 21 October 2011 15:12, Steven Watanabe <[email protected]> wrote: > > If we did that, then we couldn't use escaped docbook > in phrases. My personal opinion is that the distinction > between block elements and phrase elements should be > killed entirely. The model is too simplistic and only > causes problems. Do you have an alternative?