Re: The beauty of LATEX
Daniel James <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHOE3yfR=FHrzjkoeJ5T4BUwUV9busN+09CT3eAuHrzACZG9iQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tuesday, 25 October 2011, Joel de Guzman wrote: > On 10/25/2011 6:01 PM, Daniel James wrote: > > > > Yes, that works. Although now when you want to pass the function as a > > parameter, you have to define another lambda function. Which could get > > very verbose - especially if the function takes a few arguments. It > > That's how it's done in lisp/scheme, it's foolish to go invent > something else. > > > also requires you to always know how many arguments a function takes. > > What's wrong with that? Ah, you want it like C function pointers > where you pass only f and be done with it? That's too limiting. > You can't even curry with it. > You can do that in Scheme: http://mitpress.mit.edu/sicp/full-text/book/book-Z-H-12.html#%_sec_1.3.1 _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-docs