Re: The beauty of LATEX

"Paul A. Bristow" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.boost.documentation
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Matias Capeletto
> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 9:58 AM
> To: Discussion of Boost Documentation
> Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] The beauty of LATEX

<snip>
> > Another example is footnotes, for docbook they're easy - you just
> > write them inline. But when generating html for the web you have to
> > place the footnotes in the correct location. To find the correct
> > location you need to know about the structure.
> 
> Indeed, but supporting this kind of things in HTML requires a bigger beast. Indexing, paging,
footnotes... all
> these goodies requires a full knowledge of the document and a heavy processing of it. To make a
good job
> we will need to replicate something like LaTeX. While this maybe a really good project, I think it
is a lot
> better to rely on it or on Docbook and leave them handle these tasks.

I think handling Indexing (including C++ items that can only come from parsing the C++ code),
paging, footnotes - is *really* important for good docs. Having these now is a big advance and I
find myself using all of them even for libraries that I know well (may have written some part).

It is nice to have beauty, but as a writer and reader IMO, these aspects are all essential to
produce effective documentation.

Paul


---
Paul A. Bristow,
Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal LA8 8AB  UK
+44 1539 561830  07714330204
[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.