Re: A downside of qbk
Matias Capeletto <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJiTyxyGhJwXhqwYST=LyeiOM3+fKkjGT2xS=Uz5jWp=szSCoA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Dave Abrahams <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> As long as qbk is a full-fledged programming language, we may never be >>>> able to expect better. Any ideas? Does anyone think we can possibly >>>> convince GitHub to include a qbk processor? >> >> That would be great! > > Does anyone around here know Ruby? They'd probably only do something > like this if there was a suitable ruby wrapper to fit into their web > framework. You can also use a Python wrapper, like the one is being used to produce HTML from the rst files. >From the info page it seems they are receptive to additions: https://github.com/github/markup#readme Regards Matias