Re: A downside of qbk

Stuart Dootson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.boost.documentation
Message-ID <CA+L+JkuSu-VDPXe_wRfhkqOzMpi3skY8oFbq6Kzjk0hngigmZA@mail.gmail.com>
On 8 November 2011 04:04, Dave Abrahams <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> on Sun Nov 06 2011, Joel de Guzman <joel-AT-boost-consulting.com> wrote:
>
> > On 11/7/2011 5:21 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> >>
> >
> >> on Sun Nov 06 2011, Dave Abrahams <dave-AT-boostpro.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I've been meaning to point out the difference between
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/boost-lib/parameter/blob/master/doc/index.rst
> >>> https://github.com/boost-lib/spirit/blob/master/doc/introduction.qbk
> >>>
> >>> As long as qbk is a full-fledged programming language, we may never be
> >>> able to expect better.  Any ideas?  Does anyone think we can possibly
> >>> convince GitHub to include a qbk processor?
> >>
> >> Actually, I just had an idea: make sure that qbk is an extension of
> >> markdown syntax, which IMO is winning the wiki-like syntax wars.  Then
> >> we could get reasonable rendering for many things even where there's no
> >> qbk support at all.
> >
> > markdown has similarities to qbk syntax. But then we have to
> > tweak our qbk source to conform to its syntax. That would be
> > tedious unless done automatically. Also, the markdown syntax
> > will be a very small subset (e.g. does it even have tables at
> > all? http://tinyurl.com/3qvtr).
>
> Yeah, sort of.
>
> http://michelf.com/projects/php-markdown/extra/#table
>
> maybe there are too many flavors of Markdown; I don't know.  Maybe ReST
> would be a better choice.
>
> --
> Dave Abrahams
> BoostPro Computing
> http://www.boostpro.com
>
>
Might be worth having a look at MultiMarkdown (
http://fletcherpenney.net/multimarkdown/) - it seems to be gaining traction
as 'the' extended Markdown, with quite a few features (including tables)
over and above standard Markdown... It also has support for combining
multiple MMD files (using an index file) to produce a single resultant
document, which may be of use...

Stuart Dootson

_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-docs
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.