Re: Sample TR2 library proposal using Quickbook
Rene Rivera <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.documentation |
|---|---|
| Organization | Redshift Software, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/6/2012 11:01 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote: > > on Fri Jan 06 2012, Rene Rivera<grafikrobot-AT-gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 12/5/2011 8:23 AM, Beman Dawes wrote: >>> Rene Rivera<grafikrobot<at> gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> >>>> On 11/30/2011 10:09 AM, Beman Dawes wrote: >>>>> Rene, what did you do to cause the stylesheet to be inlined? >>>> >>>> Oh, I don't think I did for the version generated from quickbook. I made >>>> a separate version for the one sent to the committee. It should be >>>> possible.. Although it might take some XSLT to do it. >>> >>> Thinking a bit more about using Quickbook to generate non-Boost documents, there >>> are really two separate issues: >>> >>> * Using inline styles. >> >> More on this as I've gotten around to messing some more with the tree >> proposal.. >> >> I have made a change to the BoostBook XSLT code that lets me style >> with the CSS to get the look&feel of the standard documents. > > Which ones? Do you mean proposals, or working papers? For what it's > worth, proposals do not have a uniform style. I mean proposals.. And I'm aware there's no uniform style. But the idea of making it have the look&feel of the working papers is that it hopefully makes it easier for the people who are accustomed to reading the standard and working papers. Rene. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail