Re: [boost] PDF versions of Quickbook generated documentation - Do you like the serif font?
"Paul A. Bristow" <[email protected]> Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:45:37 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.documentation,gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Boost [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joel de Guzman > Sent: 18 December 2014 01:42 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [boost] PDF versions of Quickbook generated documentation - Do you > like the serif font? > > On 12/17/14 10:40 PM, Paul A. Bristow wrote: > > I've noted that for documentation using the Quickbook toolchain, we > > use a serif font (Times Roman?) for the PDF, but a sans serif for the > > equivalent HTML version. > > > > Is there a reason for this? > > > > Should they not be the same font? (So that they look the same?) > > > > Which do we prefer? > > > > Should we change either or both? > > same font! sans serif of course! ;-) I agree :-) So how about adding a specific font to the jamfile(s) <format>pdf:<xsl:param>title.font.family="Arial" <format>pdf:<xsl:param>body.font.family="Arial" <format>pdf:<xsl:param>monospace.font.family="Arial" Or will this cause trouble with readers lacking Arial font? How about other fonts? Verdana? Or is this better? <format>pdf:<xsl:param>title.font.family="sans-serif" <format>pdf:<xsl:param>body.font.family="sans-serif" <format>pdf:<xsl:param>monospace.font.family="sans-serif" Paul --- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal UK LA8 8AB +44 (0) 1539 561830