Re: [boost-docs] Query regarding boostbook and documentation

Le 09/01/16 22:53, Soul Studios a =E9crit :
>> b) DOxygen is here to stay.  I would like to see
>> someone take up the challenge of making an extension
>> which supports type requirements (aka concepts).
>>  From the users point of view, this would look like
>> the following:
>
> I personally would not want to see Doxygen becoming a requirement,
> though I understand many like it. Personally I find it an impediment to
> writing clean, readable code.

To clarify a bit: I never suggested Doxygen be a requirement. I am just =

saying that /if you want or need/, you can use it together with =

quickbook, and this chain of action is quite well supported already by =

the boost machinery.

Best,
Raffi