Re: Re: Registries [2]
Daniel Wallin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.langbinding |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 21:30 2003-07-31, David Abrahams wrote: >Daniel Wallin <[email protected]> writes: > > >> > >>Hmm, you're suggesting importing cast graph components? I don't know; > >>it seems like a waste for several extensions which are known to > >>collaborate to have to each maintain a separate copy of the cast > >>graph. I think we can do better. > > > > Ok, do you have any ideas? Would it be impossible to just share > > subgraph's? Meaning having edges that point to vertices in another > > local cast-graph. > >I honestly have no clue. How would you know which other cast graph >to link up to? What's wrong with explicit importing? It's the duplicated storage that's bad, no? How about revisiting hierarchical implicit importing? Didn't we only abandon that because we thought local registries wouldn't work on unix platforms? --- Daniel Wallin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01