Re: Registries [2]
David Abrahams <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.langbinding |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Daniel Wallin <[email protected]> writes: >> > How about revisiting hierarchical implicit importing? Didn't we only >> > abandon that because we thought local registries wouldn't work >> > on unix platforms? >> >>Argh. I don't remember. However, it seems like it could only >>complicate the cast graph issue. > > Maybe, but it seems to me that if we have explicit importing that > modifies the cast graph's, implicit importing doesn't complicate > things much. I could be wrong though.. OK, why don't you write up a description of how it would work? Then we can see if there are any obvious holes to poke in it ;-) -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01