Re: Re: Registries [2]
Daniel Wallin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.langbinding |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 23:30 2003-08-07, David Abrahams wrote: >Daniel Wallin <[email protected]> writes: > > >> > How about revisiting hierarchical implicit importing? Didn't we only > >> > abandon that because we thought local registries wouldn't work > >> > on unix platforms? > >> > >>Argh. I don't remember. However, it seems like it could only > >>complicate the cast graph issue. > > > > Maybe, but it seems to me that if we have explicit importing that > > modifies the cast graph's, implicit importing doesn't complicate > > things much. I could be wrong though.. > >OK, why don't you write up a description of how it would work? Then we >can see if there are any obvious holes to poke in it ;-) Ok I'll try. --- Daniel Wallin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01