Re: License

[2003-08-15] Daniel Wallin wrote:

>How should we handle the license in the shared code? In the code
>that I've copied from boost.python (for instance inheritance.cpp), I have
>simply kept the license note in file and added a line with my name
>(where I've made enough changes to justify it..), like so:
>
>// Copyright David Abrahams 2002.
>// Copyright Daniel Wallin 2003.
>// Permission to copy, use,
>// etc etc..
>
>Is this acceptable practice? 

As far as I know, yes.

>Should we decide upon a common license for all
>boost-langbinding code?

There's been long discusions about Boost Licensing. And there's a proposed
common license for Boost code, which I would think is the prefered one to
use from now on. But Dave knows the details about that better.

Dave, what is the status of the license for Boost?


-- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- rrivera (at) acm.org - grafik (at) redshift-software.com
-- 102708583 (at) icq


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01