Re: abstract unified interface
David Abrahams <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.langbinding |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Daniel Wallin <[email protected]> writes: > David Abrahams wrote: >> Daniel Wallin <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>Yeah it's kind of nice, but I'm concerned about the amount of additional >>>virtual calls we'd end up with. I can't tell if this matters that much, >>>but at least I think it should be considered. >> Done ;-) >> Seriously, remember that your interpreter's overhead swamps small >> C++ >> function calls. We can afford to take quite a few liberties. > > That might be true.. Not all interpreters are equally slow though. :) Sure. There are lots of ways to speed up interpretation of policies, though. People who care about cycles can write a bytecode compiler/interpreter, for example. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/