Re: Re: syntax suggestion
Daniel Wallin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.langbinding |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Alexander Nasonov wrote: > I agree that AST for the latter case cannot be eliminated. Though, I believe > the former case can be represented internally as a template parameterizied > only by a list of classes used in member pointers. The example exposes > &B::foo which is actually &A::foo, therefore, mpl::list<A> would suffice. > class_<B> needs mpl::list<A>for conversion from B* to A*. It's trivial to > call A::foo after this conversion is applied. > Not the best but much better then AST of all class entities. .. And still far worse than the current approach. -- Daniel Wallin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click