Re: syntax suggestion
David Abrahams <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.langbinding |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Alexander Nasonov <[email protected]> writes: > Although you put your reply under Daniel's words I assume you don't understand > *my* point of view. Right? > I agree that lazy evaluation is poor solution for complex classes in terms of > complie resources. I'm trying to find less aggressive to those resources > solution which has nicer syntax. I have bigger fish to fry. The .def(...) syntax seems to work pretty nicely for people. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click