Re: Changes I had to make to get langbinding to build
John Moeller <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.langbinding |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Roman Yakovenko wrote: > On 6/15/07, John Moeller <[email protected]> wrote: >> So now that I've done all that, should I get some of this into CVS? Or >> should I post some diffs up? If I should commit these changes to CVS, I >> think that I would need access, but I don't know if I'm supposed to have >> that. I'm not a developer with an approved project. (Or can I commit >> with anonymous CVS? I've never developed using anonymous CVS.) Either >> way, I don't really want to lose this work. >> >> Another thing; Fusion has invocation support now. I looked into it >> briefly, and it seems that it may allow some contraction of the invoker >> code; at least, it could replace a good portion of aux::invoke. Is this >> something that you would be interested in seeing done? Or should it be >> left alone? > > It looks like you make some good progress with the library. > > Does it make sense to setup a new project and commit all changes to it? That may not be a bad idea, but I'd hate to fork the development if David, Daniel and Rene want the changes here. -- John Moeller [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/