Re: Changes I had to make to get langbinding to build
David Abrahams <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.langbinding |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
on Fri Jun 15 2007, John Moeller <fishcorn-AT-gmail.com> wrote: > Roman Yakovenko wrote: >> On 6/15/07, John Moeller <[email protected]> wrote: >>> So now that I've done all that, should I get some of this into CVS? Or >>> should I post some diffs up? If I should commit these changes to CVS, I >>> think that I would need access, but I don't know if I'm supposed to have >>> that. I'm not a developer with an approved project. (Or can I commit >>> with anonymous CVS? I've never developed using anonymous CVS.) Either >>> way, I don't really want to lose this work. >>> >>> Another thing; Fusion has invocation support now. I looked into it >>> briefly, and it seems that it may allow some contraction of the invoker >>> code; at least, it could replace a good portion of aux::invoke. Is this >>> something that you would be interested in seeing done? Or should it be >>> left alone? >> >> It looks like you make some good progress with the library. >> >> Does it make sense to setup a new project and commit all changes to it? > > That may not be a bad idea, but I'd hate to fork the development if > David, Daniel and Rene want the changes here. I'd rather keep it in the sandbox area of the new boost svn repository -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriaseminar.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/