Re: [Java] Function binding

John Moeller wrote:
> 3.  Given that such a solution would essentially be a *replacement* of 
> the invocation architecture currently in place, which of the following 
> approaches would work best for Boost?
> 
>    a.  Make the solution generic enough to work with any binding, thus 
> having an alternative invocation architecture

Let me stress here that I'm not suggesting removal of the existing 
invocation architecture, just an addition to it.

Also, rereading some of the posts about the intent of langbinding, I 
realize that what I suggest may not work for a 
compile-once-link-anything kind of approach that langbinding tries to 
achieve.

-- 

John Moeller
[email protected]


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/