Re: [Java] Function Binding Redux (long post)

David Abrahams wrote:
> on Fri Jul 20 2007, John Moeller <fishcorn-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Okay.  So I've been spending the last few weeks attempting to figure out 
>> how one would use a "natural" syntax to make a function call in the Java 
>> Langbinding, that is, if you have a Langbinding class "X" and a function 
>> "f" defined as a member, how can you write code such as this:
>>
>>    X x = new X(...);
>>    ...
>>    SomeClass sc = x.f(y, z, 42);
> 
> Is this Java or C++ code?
> 
> In the domain of language binding, if you want to be understood, you
> have to be constantly vigilant for these ambiguities, especially when
> the two languages have similar syntaxes.
> 
> I didn't read further in detail, so you might want to revisit the
> whole post and look for other instances of this issue.

Fair enough.  All of the code in the post is Java code.

-- 

John Moeller
[email protected]


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/