Re: Re: Registries [2]

At 10:20 2003-07-28, Daniel Wallin wrote:
>At 01:10 2003-07-28, David Abrahams wrote:
>>Oh.  The implicit imports I thought we'd handle by having a global
>>converter registration chain for any type and simply tacking it onto
>>the end of each extension's local chain as part of the initialization
>>of the local registration.
>
>Right, but this seems to imply the same implementation that I suggested.
>Because even if module Y is initialized after module X, module X needs
>to know about the converters module Y exposes. So the initialization of
>module Y needs to add converters do module X's registry. Right?

I think I misinterpreted this, did you mean linking the actual chains together
rather than adding converters from the global chain to the local ones?

---
Daniel Wallin



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01