Re: Re: Registries [2]

[2003-07-28] Daniel Wallin wrote:

>At 18:21 2003-07-28, David Abrahams wrote:
>>Daniel Wallin <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>> > I've started some work on the registry. Basically I have made templates
>> > from the registry code and started on the central registry. I've
>> > organized it like
>> > this:
>> >
>> >    boost/langbinding/registry.hpp
>> >    boost/langbinding/impl/registry.hpp
>> >
>> > The implementation files are to be included in cpp files for 
>> luabind/bpl where
>> > the templates they contain are explicitly instantiated.
>> >
>> > Shall I check this in?
>>
>>Sounds good.  Maybe we should go with langbinding/registry.hpp and
>>langbinding/registry.ipp?  That would probably reduce confusion and
>>directory-hopping.
>
>Yep, I changed it to .ipp and checked it in. I don't know if it worked
though;
>cvs said it was checking it in to "Attic/*". Also, whenever I update from
>the cvs every file is made read-only, what am I doing wrong?

Nothing wrong... It does look like allthe files are there from my POV. The
read-only aspect is the default functionality of CVS. You would nornamlly do
a cvs edit to get the read-write access, and to inform others that you are
working on the files. But you can change the default to read-write... In
Admin:Preferences, go to the Globals tab, and uncheck the "Checkout
read-only" option.


-- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- rrivera (at) acm.org - grafik (at) redshift-software.com
-- 102708583 (at) icq


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01