Re: Re: Registries [2]
Daniel Wallin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.langbinding |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 18:42 2003-07-29, David Abrahams wrote: >Daniel Wallin <[email protected]> writes: > > > I'm starting to doubt our motives for local registries altogether, I > > might be forgetting something or I might be drunk, but right now it > > seems to me that we'd be better off with only a global registry. I > > just can't think of any cases where there would be interest in hiding > > converters. > > This is quite a turnover for me, so if someone could convince me > > that there are benefits with local registries I'd be glad. ;) > >Consider: one extension is converting std::vector<int> into native >tuples, and another has exposed a class_ wrapper. Right, but that only justifies local registries of to_xxx converters. Any reason to have the from_xxx converters local as well? --- Daniel Wallin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01