Re: Registries [2]
David Abrahams <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.langbinding |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Daniel Wallin <[email protected]> writes: > At 03:08 2003-07-31, David Abrahams wrote: >>Daniel Wallin <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > At 00:25 2003-07-31, David Abrahams wrote: >> > >> >>This seems to me to be the killer argument against having any implicit >> >>imports of from-xxx converters. No? >> > >> > Well, yeah.. Unfortunately the same argument applies to the >> > cast-graph too. >> >>:( > > But we can still share the code though, right? Sure. > I already made the local registry into a singleton, so we'd just do > the same for the inheritance-code and link registry<T>::instance() > and inheritance_graph::instance() statically. And how would two extensions share a cast-graph? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01