Re: Ublas move semantics
Nasos Iliopoulos <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.ublas |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Giorgo, there is definitely a thought of adding c++11 move semantics in uBLAS, but because at the moment there are ways around it, it is not considered an immediate priority. Adding said support is a fairly trivial task that needs though a careful design. If someone thinks he can do it for say one or more basic classes, I think it would immediately be acceptable into uBlas. A good start would be the design of relevant std::vector move semantic implementations that can be found around the web. -Nasos On 07/27/2013 04:34 AM, gsermaid wrote: > Hi all, > > I am aware of the BOOST_UBLAS_MOVE_SEMANTICS, but I think I cannot use > that in order to create my own move constructors in my own classes. > Does ublas support rvalue references and if not, are there any plans > for this? > > Thanks, > Giorgos > > > _______________________________________________ > ublas mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas > Sent to: [email protected]