Re: Status of development /Benchmarks

Rutger ter Borg <[email protected]> Mon, 09 Dec 2013 13:22:41 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.lib.boost.ublas
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On 2013-12-09 11:18, sguazt wrote:
>
>
> +1 for a library with loosely-coupled feature, even if this means a
> completely rewriting of uBLAS
>
> For the integration of computational kernels, why don't we use the
> boost-numeric_bindings lib?
>
> Also, I'd like to have more MATLAB-like functionalities (I've
> implemented some of them in boost-ublasx, but they relies on
> boost-numeric_bindings and LAPACK functions)
>

If there is enough interest to integrate (parts of) the numeric bindings 
library, I'm willing to help.

Cheers,

Rutger