Re: Status of development /Benchmarks
Nasos Iliopoulos <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.ublas |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/09/2013 07:22 AM, Rutger ter Borg wrote: > On 2013-12-09 11:18, sguazt wrote: >> >> >> +1 for a library with loosely-coupled feature, even if this means a >> completely rewriting of uBLAS >> >> For the integration of computational kernels, why don't we use the >> boost-numeric_bindings lib? >> >> Also, I'd like to have more MATLAB-like functionalities (I've >> implemented some of them in boost-ublasx, but they relies on >> boost-numeric_bindings and LAPACK functions) >> > > If there is enough interest to integrate (parts of) the numeric > bindings library, I'm willing to help. > I think a part of the numeric bindings should be a part of uBLAS. > Cheers, > > Rutger > > > > _______________________________________________ > ublas mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas > Sent to: [email protected]