Re: CI setup

Hi,

thanks Stefan. I somehow cannot push local commits to the remote. Are we
supposed to fork from GSOC/UBLAS ?

Stefan, do we agree on my project proposal?
If yes, I would like to start designing the tensor and helper template
classes.
I would choose the rank/order (number of dimensions), the dimensions and
the layout to be runtime variables.
So the only two template parameters would be data type and the storage
array type (unbounded/bounded array).

Regards,
Cem







Stefan Seefeld via ublas <[email protected]> schrieb am Fr., 27. Apr.
2018, 16:25:

> Hi all,
>
> as we have three students working on Boost.uBLAS projects this summer, I
> think it would be useful to have some CI coverage to allow new code to be
> tested across platforms.
>
> I'm thus going to set up some basic CI coverage (Travis-CI and AppVeyor)
> over the next couple of days. Once that's done, all the GSoC repos can
> rebase onto that and do whatever else is needed to use these services. I'll
> send a note once it's ready.
>
> Regards,
>
> [image: Stefan]
>
> --
>
>       ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ublas mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
> Sent to: [email protected]
>